SALISBURY — On Oct. 22, Town Meeting will have a 17 warrant articles to consider, including a home rule petition requesting the Legislature alter its definition of affordable housing in a way that limits more large Chapter 40B subdivisions in town.
Article 12 requests that the Legislature include mobile and manufactured homes that have remained on the same parcel of land for 20 years or more in its definition of low- and moderate-income housing under Chapter 40B of the state’s affordable housing statute. According to Town Manager Neil Harrington, the price of these dwellings falls into the affordable category, but the state has not included them in the town’s affordable inventory because mobile homes are considered temporary by current state definition.
Salisbury has long argued that if its mobile home units were counted as part of the town’s affordable dwellings, it would more than meet the state’s requirement of having at least 10 percent of its domiciles in the affordable category. Once a community meets the 10 percent level, it can turn away developers who want to build large 40B subdivisions in town. Currently, Salisbury must accept them with little authority over how and where they’re built.
Chapter 40B developers can ignore a town’s zoning, building many more units per acre than town ordinances allow, even ignoring setback regulations. This exemption is offered as an enticement for 40B developers, who must price at least 25 percent of the units in what the state considers a moderate range for this region.
Salisbury has been the target of a number of 40B developments in recent years, including Salisbury Woods and Windgate. However, although a quarter of the units were priced in what the state considers “affordable,” few Salisbury residents have been able to afford to buy them.
Attempts to alter the 40B regulations have failed over recent years, and town officials are hoping this alteration in the 40B statute definition will assist the town in stabilizing its housing figures.