NewburyportNews.com, Newburyport, MA

Opinion

February 12, 2014

An LHD in sheep's clothing?

To the editor:

Dyke Hendrickson has already been criticized for calling Ward 2 Councilor Eigerman’s two proposals for an Interim Downtown Overlay District just another form of a local historic district, but that’s exactly what it is. It’s just another way our local government can strip homeowners of their personal property rights and maybe their homes.

Eigerman’s backdoor approach of calling this ordinance “only interim” and the quiet manner in which he presented his proposal is just another way of trying to convince homeowners that the restrictions on their homes will only be for a short time and therefore it is not very important. But, in reality, most taxes and government controls are never temporary, but in fact usually increase with time. It states, “it is anticipated that this section shall be reviewed, and may be amended and/or replaced by permanent controls.’’

In all fairness to Mr. Eigerman, he is only doing what he told his supporters he would do during his election. The trouble is, his supporters in Ward 2 and the present Fruit Street LHD do not represent the majority of citizens in Newburyport.

I have many concerns with Mr. Eigerman’s “de facto demolition.” According to the summary released by the Planning Board, “this ordinance would also require property owners within the IDOD to maintain historic buildings (which means private homes within this proposed area) in a state of good repair, and would discourage “de facto demolition,” or referred to as “demolition by neglect.”

Some of the questions which come to mind are:

Who would determine if a homeowner needs to repair their home or maintain their home to the “Standards of the Committee”? What happens if it is not meeting their standards? Is the homeowner fined? Is a lien placed on the homeowners’ property until the maintenance is done to their satisfaction? I believe this proposal would include all four sides of your home, and if so would we be required to allow them into our property to examine all four sides? It also mentions there must not be a depreciation in market value — who determines that? Could homeowners be placed on, for example, a 5-year painting schedule?

Text Only | Photo Reprints

NDN Video
Crews rescue elderly woman trapped inside flooded minivan Taylor Swift Reveals New Album 1989 is Full-On Pop Serious Flash Flooding in Arizona Man Poses for New Mugshot Photo Wearing Shirt with Old Mugshot Photo On It Disquieting times for Malaysia's 'fish listeners' Caught On Camera: Johnny Manziel Obscene Gesture Rita Ora Embraces the Ice Bucket Challenge Bird surprises soccer player Ashley Young during game Chapter Two: Never too late to become an artist Ice Bucket Challenge Goes Viral, Raises Over $15M For ALS Damaging Winds Stop the Show! In the Cockpit of the Air Force's Elite Squadron Pathologist: Autopsy Shows Teen Repeatedly Shot Christina Aguilera Has a Baby Girl Marvel Fans: Watch Dancing Baby Groot Over and Over! Raw: Protesters, Police Clash in Ferguson Gov. Rick Perry responds to indictment Breaking: Officials release name of police officer in Ferguson shooting Man Shot As Protesters Defy Curfew in Ferguson Justin Bieber & Selena Gomez Back Together for Two ‘Secret’ Dates
Special Features
NRA Waterfront Plans