, Newburyport, MA


February 21, 2013

NRA plan doesn't fit Newburyport brand

I’d like to add my voice to the growing discussion about the NRA’s development plans for the waterfront lots. I came into this discussion with an open mind, but after studying the issue in depth in a “balanced” approach, I find the current NRA proposal to be the wrong one for Newburyport’s central waterfront.

I’m reminded of a similar proposal a few years back in which the city administration at that time worked with Mass DOT on a proposal to rebuild High Street. Mass DOT consulted with the city on a plan, would own the majority of the costs and the city would reap the benefits. And then we saw “the plan” that called for four lanes of traffic, no trees, etc. The opposition rally was “High Street not a High-way.” In short, the “standard” plan as proposed by the state agency did not fit with Newburyport and thus we did not move forward with that plan. I can’t help but see the striking parallel to the NRA working with MassDevelopment (and their team of consultants: Abramson Assoc., Union Studio, etc.). What might work in Boston, Cambridge or Marina Bay doesn’t fit the Newburyport brand, specifically our history of communal use of our waterfront.

Additionally, not only is the size and scope of the proposal out of proportion to the voters’ wishes, but more importantly, this project is non-compliant with every regulation enacted for clean water, tideland use restriction and other environmental issues (think highly contaminated soil meets Clean Water Act). This project, as presently defined, would subject the taxpayers of Newburyport to the potential of long-term litigation from federal and state agencies, citizens groups and the unlucky developer once all the restrictions are publicly disclosed.

To make its case, the NRA has consistently floated the notion that this project could be worth $20 million or more. The fact is the City of Newburyport would only see a small fraction (maybe 2 to 4 percent) of that money. The big money is made by the developer and those involved in selling the condos or the commercial space. In short, there is little to no long-term upside for the citizens/taxpayers for having a building on these lots. These lots are already generating revenue. The NRA currently takes in a bit less than $100K a year for their portion of parking revenues as a result of the city’s implementation of paid parking, which they are spending on consultants in support of this proposal.

Text Only | Photo Reprints

NDN Video
8-year-old Boy Gets His Wish: Fly Like Iron Man Toddler climbs into vending machine Much-Anticipated 'Gone Girl' Trailer Finally Debuts! (VIDEO) Dog and Toddler Wear Matching Outfits in Adorable Photo Series VP Biden: "World witnesses ordinary citizens doing extraordinary things" It's Official! Michael Strahan Joins "GMA" Blood Moon Time-lapse Actress Lake Bell Goes Topless The Five Weirdest Local Taxes in America Applicants Vying for 'World's Toughest Job' Get Heartwarming Surprise Awkward: Crist catches Lt. Gov. insulting him on camera NASA Showcases Lunar Eclipse US Airways Tweets Graphic Photo of Nude Woman Behind the scenes of the Marathon anniversary photo shoot American Airlines Responds After Girl Tweets Alleged Terror Threat 'Joke' Charlie White's "Dancing" Mistake Olympic Great & Baltimore Native Michael Phelps Ends Retirement; Eyes Rio 2014 NFL Draft: Potential Booms And Busts William and Kate Squash Baby No. 2 Rumors With a Wine-Tasting Trip Who Showed Up at Coachella?
Special Features
NRA Waterfront Plans