It is not a popular thing in America these days to be a war protester. But worse than to be treated with disrespect, perhaps, is to be ignored.
We were intrigued last week to come across an Associated Press story out of Montpelier, Vt., that related the story of a small group of anti-war protesters who gathered at noon every Friday in front of the post office holding signs opposing whatever war the U.S. happens to be fighting at the moment. Newburyport also has a long-lived pro-peace vigil on the weekend in Market Square, usually attended by one person or perhaps on occasion a small handful.
Whatever one thinks of war, this is a good time to applaud the right of peaceful protest, especially in this day and age where many contrary opinions -- anti-war sentiment being just one of them -- seem to many Americans mostly overlooked. Washington D.C. does what it wills, and a certain segment of our society wonders whether even the ballot box changes some things.
Anti-war protesters want to remind us of the cost of war. The human cost, obviously. But consider the economic cost, as well. The Associated Press has reported that the wars in Iraq, Afghanistan and the first Persian Gulf conflict in the early 1990s cost the U.S. $12 billion a year just to compensate inactive military personnel or family members of those who’ve perished. Since 2003 the total, not including medical expenses, has exceeded $50 billion. These costs will continue to grow for many years.
Such costs are not limited to recent wars. Vietnam War compensation payments are now above $22 billion annually, about twice the size of the FBI’s annual budget. We spend $40 billion a year compensating veterans and survivors from the Spanish-American War from 1898, World War I, World War II, the Korean War, and the wars beginning in the 1990s in Iraq.