NewburyportNews.com, Newburyport, MA

Opinion

February 25, 2013

Sequester and the president

To the editor:

The last couple of days all I’ve been hearing about in the news is “sequester.” What is sequester? According to my online dictionary, “to sequester is to isolate or take away something.” For example, if I take away a piece of candy from someone and hide it. I am sequestering that person from the candy or vice versa, depending on your view of things.

Federal sequester was agreed to by the president and Congress three years ago, because they couldn’t agree on a federal budget and how they were going to pay their bills. The agreement stated that by a certain amount of time, if a budget wasn’t agreed to, the government would go into automatic sequester, causing a decrease in federal spending on federally controlled agencies and programs such as the NEA, Pentagon, DEA, FBI, Border Patrol, etc.

President Obama and his supporters would have us think that to sequester government agencies and programs would cause the ceasing of operations and mass layoffs of government agencies and turn the federal government into chaos.

In actuality, all sequester does is limit the amount of federal spending on government agencies and programs. In other words, hypothetically, if The NEA (National Education Association) wants a 10 percent increase in spending for next year, but only gets 5 percent, those and their supporters at the NEA will consider that a cut in their budget, even though they’re getting a 5 percent increase.

In January of this year the president and Congress signed a bill to temporarily forestall sequester for two months by agreeing to raising the taxes on the wealthiest Americans and balancing the federal budget by March of this year. However, two months have passed and no budget has been signed. Thus the threat of sequester is looming again.

The president is threatening mass chaos if he doesn’t get an increase in government spending and a tax increase on the wealthiest Americans again.

In my opinion I really don’t think that much will happen if the government were to be allowed to go into sequester for a few years and allow our spending to get under control.

MIKE TYSON

Salisbury

Text Only | Photo Reprints

NDN Video
Spurs' Popovich has no problem with Spurs' intensity Inside Kim Kardashian's Premature Labor Three Charged for Enslaving Mother and Daughter Raw: Huge Fire Near Yosemite National Park RAW: NSA Director Says 50 Plots Foiled Paige Butcher Scorches on Hawaii Beach Video: worst way to load cargo onto a plane Never-before-seen footage of '08 Times Square bomber Obama: NSA Secret Data Gathering 'Transparent' WATCH IT: Lil Wayne tramples American flag Mariah Carey Looks Beautiful in a Tiny Cut-Out Swimsuit Out of Control Boat Throws Passengers Overboard See Lindsay Lohan in Rehab Sofia Vergara Posts Perky Backside Pic in Thong Gaga Ditches Her Crazy Couture Caught on Tape: Teacher Accused of Beating Autistic Child "Stay Classy" Campaign Aims to Curb Binge Drinking Sesame Street Tackling Tough Topic Parents in Jail Miss Utah Fumbles Interview Question Deranged man claims Newark-bound flight was poisoned
Special Features
NRA Waterfront Plans