NewburyportNews.com, Newburyport, MA

Opinion

February 25, 2013

Sequester and the president

To the editor:

The last couple of days all I’ve been hearing about in the news is “sequester.” What is sequester? According to my online dictionary, “to sequester is to isolate or take away something.” For example, if I take away a piece of candy from someone and hide it. I am sequestering that person from the candy or vice versa, depending on your view of things.

Federal sequester was agreed to by the president and Congress three years ago, because they couldn’t agree on a federal budget and how they were going to pay their bills. The agreement stated that by a certain amount of time, if a budget wasn’t agreed to, the government would go into automatic sequester, causing a decrease in federal spending on federally controlled agencies and programs such as the NEA, Pentagon, DEA, FBI, Border Patrol, etc.

President Obama and his supporters would have us think that to sequester government agencies and programs would cause the ceasing of operations and mass layoffs of government agencies and turn the federal government into chaos.

In actuality, all sequester does is limit the amount of federal spending on government agencies and programs. In other words, hypothetically, if The NEA (National Education Association) wants a 10 percent increase in spending for next year, but only gets 5 percent, those and their supporters at the NEA will consider that a cut in their budget, even though they’re getting a 5 percent increase.

In January of this year the president and Congress signed a bill to temporarily forestall sequester for two months by agreeing to raising the taxes on the wealthiest Americans and balancing the federal budget by March of this year. However, two months have passed and no budget has been signed. Thus the threat of sequester is looming again.

The president is threatening mass chaos if he doesn’t get an increase in government spending and a tax increase on the wealthiest Americans again.

In my opinion I really don’t think that much will happen if the government were to be allowed to go into sequester for a few years and allow our spending to get under control.

MIKE TYSON

Salisbury

Text Only | Photo Reprints

NDN Video
AK-47-wielding thug may be the most bumbling crook ever Oklahoma Survivors, Heroes Survey Damage Trout's cycle a boost for Angels Raw: New Video of Deadly Oklahoma Tornado Kim Kardashian Flaunts Pregnant Bikini Body in Greece NBA star pledges $1M to help tornado recovery Shakira's Shocking Talent Morgan Freeman falls asleep on air GRAPHIC: Blood-Soaked Machete Killer Caught on Tape Elin Nordegren Furious With Lindsey Vonn For Parading Kids in Public Camera Captures Climber As He Loses Grip And Falls Helen Mirren Meets with Dying Boy in Queen Elizabeth's Place Crowd Chants '¡Si, Se Puede!' After Passage of Immigration Bill DWTS Crowns a Winner Police Ram House to End Hostage Standoff Demi Moore a Rocks Bikini at Harry Morton's Family House Anthony Weiner: I'm running for New York City mayor Kate Middleton's Dress Flies Up VIRAL: Baby makes epic soccer goal The Hangover Baby All Grown Up
Special Features
NRA Waterfront Plans