NewburyportNews.com, Newburyport, MA

Opinion

May 13, 2013

A COW concept, not a COW plan

To the editor:

Wow, I don’t even know where to begin in responding to David Strand’s letter concerning the Committee for an Open Waterfront’s alternative concept for the Newburyport Central Waterfront. To begin, there appears to be a misconception that we presented “the” plan for the central waterfront. This is not a COW plan, as Mr. Strand states, but rather, it is a COW concept. All of the details have not been worked out.

Our concept, as stated, presents an alternative approach for development of the waterfront that preserves all of the current open space, much of the existing parking and an expanded public park. Our cost estimate included only these three features. To pay for this development, our concept includes funding derived primarily from grants and private donations.

Our concept is significantly different from the NRA and Union Studios’ concept, with their reduced open space, significantly reduced parking and only minimally expanded public park. What’s more, the NRA concept includes selling/leasing portions of the central waterfront for condo and storefront development at the expense of existing parklands, parking spaces and, of course, open space.

Regarding my not speaking “confidently” about our concept, let me state “very confidently” that our concept includes all of the additional park, all of the preserved parking and all of the open space that we showed in our drawings. However, the completed central waterfront may not include the natural area or the wading pool and family area or possibly even the waterfront deck. These concepts were presented as features that could be included in a final plan to draw more people to the waterfront and to enhance their experience while they are there.

Alternatively, the NRA hopes to use new restaurants and shops to bring people to the waterfront. And, if they do, what happens to existing shops and restaurants in Market Square and on State and Pleasant streets? More urban blight perhaps? Either way, the final waterfront plan should be decided by the public, not by five appointed members of the NRA board.

Finally, our 168-page report, Funding the Waterfront Park Without Private Development, is not a signed check for developing the central waterfront. However, it is the result of many months of research that COW volunteers have conducted identifying over $17M of grant monies that can be applied for annually to fund a final Open Waterfront Plan. A better concept than NRA’s? I think so!

Lon Hachmeister

Vice president, Committee for an Open Waterfront

1
Text Only | Photo Reprints

NDN Video
Crews rescue elderly woman trapped inside flooded minivan Taylor Swift Reveals New Album 1989 is Full-On Pop Serious Flash Flooding in Arizona Man Poses for New Mugshot Photo Wearing Shirt with Old Mugshot Photo On It Disquieting times for Malaysia's 'fish listeners' Caught On Camera: Johnny Manziel Obscene Gesture Rita Ora Embraces the Ice Bucket Challenge Bird surprises soccer player Ashley Young during game Chapter Two: Never too late to become an artist Ice Bucket Challenge Goes Viral, Raises Over $15M For ALS Damaging Winds Stop the Show! In the Cockpit of the Air Force's Elite Squadron Pathologist: Autopsy Shows Teen Repeatedly Shot Christina Aguilera Has a Baby Girl Marvel Fans: Watch Dancing Baby Groot Over and Over! Raw: Protesters, Police Clash in Ferguson Gov. Rick Perry responds to indictment Breaking: Officials release name of police officer in Ferguson shooting Man Shot As Protesters Defy Curfew in Ferguson Justin Bieber & Selena Gomez Back Together for Two ‘Secret’ Dates
Special Features
NRA Waterfront Plans