To the editor:
It was great to see a page 1 story in The Daily News (Nov. 9) about three non-binding questions on the Nov. 6 ballot. And it was so useful to citizens to see the results for all the locations in the districts of state Rep. Mike Costello-D and state Rep.-elect Lenny Mirra-R.
With all the attention devoted to the candidates in a presidential election year, and to the unusual number of all-out campaigns area voters faced, even the three statewide, binding ballot questions struggled to get the full attention of voters.
Therefore, it is understandable that all the important aspects of these non-binding votes could not be included, so we are taking this opportunity address a few key points of the ballot question brought on by the 2010 U.S. Supreme Court decision known as Citizens United.
First, keep in mind that the Massachusetts Legislature has already voted to seek a 28th U.S. Constitutional Amendment to right the wrongs resulting from the Citizens United ruling. The question was still on the ballot in 170 Bay State towns and cities, because there was no certainty that the state House and Senate would act before their legislative session ended this summer, so both a bill in the Legislature and a ballot question were necessary.
However, the ballot question still mattered, because many citizens had not had the chance to vote on the issue at a town meeting or express their views to city councilors.
“It broadens the picture to include many more citizens,” said Walter Mott of Newburyport. “Now it’s time to move to another level.”
In contrast to all the other Massachusetts ballot questions this year, the Citizens United vote was a direct component of a national process, one laid out in the Constitution, which provides in part for state legislatures to petition the Congress to pass a proposed amendment and send it to the states for ratification.