, Newburyport, MA


November 2, 2013

Social Security 'reform' would bring harm

To the editor:

For some time, the buzzword in political circles has been “reform” in education, taxes and “entitlements.” “Reform” has a pleasing ring to it, implying that all these matters will be changed for the better. Upon close examination of some proposals in these areas, we find that maybe they are not designed to make things better, but as the word “reform” suggests — just changed — and for the worse.

Social Security, the program that for the last 78 years has kept the elderly from falling into dire poverty, has been the target of the Republicans since its inception. Social Security is not going broke. According to the Social Security Administration, Social Security has a surplus today of $2.8 trillion and can pay out every benefit owed to every eligible person for the next 20 years. Social Security has not contributed to the deficit. Social Security is funded independently by FICA taxes that are paid by workers and their employers.

One of the “reforms” would increase the eligibility age for Social Security. There is little regard in these “reforms” for people, long before they reach 70, who can’t do their job any longer because of age, or lose their job and have no chance of being rehired. Social Security currently supports more than 57 million Americans and contributes to an average two-thirds of income for those over 65. Without it, 44 percent of the elderly would qualify as poor, but with Social Security, the poverty rate is only 9 percent. Imagine a 65-year-old, ineligible for Social Security, now having to depend on federal or state poverty programs, charity or dependence on his/her children or other relatives. That would not save the government money — or protect the dignity of the individual.

The so-called chained-CPI, which recalculates how COLA’s are formulated, is not a “modest tweak.” If the chained CPI went into effect today, a senior aged 65 would receive $658 a year less in Social Security benefits when he/she is 75, and $1,100 a year less at age 85. Further, the average disabled veteran would lose tens of thousands of dollars in benefits over his or her lifetime

Alfred Moskowitz


Text Only | Photo Reprints

NDN Video
Jabari Parker's Top 5 Plays From Duke Career Kourtney Kardashian Is a Bikini Babe More Manpower Than Ever Expected At 4/20 Rally Debunk'd: Miley Cyrus AIDS, Cheeseburgers Cause Cancer, Military Warning Bill Previewing the NBA playoffs Raw: Orthodox Christians Observe Easter Rite My name is Cocaine Raw: Space X Launches to Space Station Lohan Gets Candid About Her Sex List The 2014 New York Auto Show Meet Johnny Manziel's New Girlfriend Chelsea Clinton Announces Pregnancy Funny: Celebrating Easter with Martha Stewart and Friends Man Accuses 'X-Men' Director Bryan Singer of Sexually Abusing Him As a Teenager Man hit with $525 federal fine after he doesn't pay for soda refill Lea Michele & Naya Rivera Feuding? Jabari Parker declares for the NBA draft Singing Nun Belts Out Cyndi Lauper New West, Texas Explosion Video Swim Daily, Throwback Thursday
Special Features
NRA Waterfront Plans