By Edward Mason
Staff writer
April 22, 2008 08:34 am BOSTON — In November, Massachusetts taxpayers will be asked if they want to vote themselves a tax cut of more than $3,000. State lawmakers are worried the answer will be "Yes." A ballot question would let voters abolish the state income tax. While the proposal has largely flown under the radar, Beacon Hill lawmakers and budget watchdogs fear the climate is right for it to pass — with disastrous consequences, in their view. The Coalition for Small Government, which is behind the ballot question, says ending the 5.3 percent income tax would be anything but bad. About 3 million taxpayers would save on average $3,600 a year, according to the ballot question's sponsors. The state Department of Revenue uses a slightly lower figure — $3,180 — based on the "typical" taxpaying family of three that owns a home. Carla Howell, the leader of the Coalition for Small Government, who has run for state auditor, U.S. senator and governor as the Libertarian nominee, said the question isn't just about voting for a tax cut. It's about a fundamental overhaul of state government. "It will take $11 billion out of the hands of Massachusetts big government and put it into the hands of men and women who earned it," said Howell. Howell said the state would then be forced to spend its money wisely, meaning there'd be less waste and patronage. Moreover, putting money back into the people's hands would create jobs. "The private sector operates more effectively than the government," Howell said. Second time around Abolishing the state income tax may seem to be wishful thinking, but an identical ballot question backed by Howell received 45 percent of the vote in 2002. The Merrimack Valley was a hotbed of anti-tax sentiment in 2002, with nine cities and towns voting for abolition, including Amesbury, Rowley, Georgetown, Groveland and Salisbury. Newburyport, Newbury, West Newbury and Merrimac voters were against it. Howell likes her chances in 2008. "There's a very good chance it could pass this time," Howell said. Howell's opponents agree — and they're worried. Michael Widmer, president of the Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, said voters may be in the mood to give themselves a pay raise by ending the income tax. The House recently voted to raise nearly $400 million in taxes. Gas prices seem to be rising without end. Property values are falling, but property tax relief promised by Gov. Deval Patrick has not materialized. "More and more, individuals are feeling squeezed," Widmer said. "And when they feel squeezed, they will vote themselves a tax cut and not contemplate the consequences." The $11 billion cost would be too much for the state to bear, said Sen. Bruce E. Tarr, R-Gloucester, whose district includes Newbury, Rowley, Georgetown, Groveland and West Newbury. He, too, worries people will vote for the tax cut in anger without weighing the outcome. "If it were to pass, it would create tremendous problems," Tarr said. "What would come in its place could be worse." Some of the consequences would be unseen by most people but still felt. Wall Street would lose confidence in the state's ability to repay its debts, which would make it more expensive for the state to borrow, opponents say. Gov. Deval Patrick has proposed borrowing more than $12 billion to pay for improvements to roads, bridges and schools. But Howell says opponents are just trying to scare people. Under her proposal, the income tax — and the accompanying revenues — would not disappear overnight. The tax rate would be cut to 2.65 percent on Jan. 1, 2009 and then eliminated a year later. Lawmakers won't have to raise taxes to replace the lost income tax money, she claimed. The state would still have $17 billion in tax revenue from other sources, which combined with federal and other funds would allow the state to keep up with its obligations — as long as it eliminates the waste. "People don't understand that the state is swimming in money," Howell said. "(There would be) $17 billion after we end the income tax. The essential services people care about cost a fraction of that. The state and local governments have tons of cash. And that's something that the everyday taxpayer is running short of these days."
How region voted on 2002 income tax repeal Community Yes No Amesbury 2,572 2,543 Georgetown 1,433 729 Groveland 1,356 1,167 Merrimac 1,144 1,204 Newbury 1,456 1,536 Newburyport 3,309 4,183 Rowley 1,162 1,033 Salisbury 1,389 1,152 West Newbury 910 981
—
Copyright © 1999-2008 cnhi, inc.